As debate about immigration policy rages from small towns to state capitals, from coffee shops to Congress, would-be immigrants are dying in the desert along the US-Mexico border. Beginning in the
1990s, the US government effectively sealed off the most common border crossing routes. This had the unintended effect of forcing desperate people to seek new paths across open desert. At least 4,000
of them died between 1995 and 2009. While some Americans thought the dead had gotten what they deserved, other Americans organized humani-tarian aid groups. A Common Humanity examines some of
the most active aid organizations in Tucson, Arizona, which has become a hotbed of advocacy on behalf of undocumented immigrants.
With its meticulously researched material thoughtfully presented, A Common Humanity
would be an ideal textbook.
This book is a thorough investigation of the most human responses to the most difficult of human situations, undocumented migration. It brings our sensibility down from the raw numbers and data to the level of human feeling and solidarity for one's brother and sister. Few studies in the literature on migration that combine the language of globalization, civil religion, spiritual duty, and civic organization. Van Ham's narrative is thorough, clear, intense, and engaging.
--Tony Payan, author of The Three U.S.-Mexico Border Wars: Drugs, Immigration, and Homeland Security
This is the first book to examine immigrant aid groups from
the inside. Author Lane Van Ham spent more than three years observing the groups and many hours in discussions and interviews. He is particularly interested in how immigrant advocates both uphold the
legitimacy of the United States and maintain a broader view of its social responsibilities. By advocating for immigrants regardless of their documentation status, he suggests, advocates navigate the
conflicting pulls of their own na-tion-state citizenship and broader obligations to their neighbors in a globalizing world. And although the advocacy organizations are not overtly religious, Van Ham
finds that they do employ religious symbolism as part of their public rhetoric, arguing that immigrants are entitled to humane treatment based on universal human values.
and immensely engaging, A Common Humanity adds a valuable human dimension to the immigration debate.